Compare performance (327 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 77,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or BMW X5?
In the dynamic world of modern SUVs, the BMW X5 and the Mazda CX-60 stand out as compelling choices. Both models come packed with an array of technical innovations and features designed to provide a superior driving experience. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison to determine which SUV emerges on top.
The BMW X5 offers a varied lineup with diesel, petrol, and plug-in hybrid engines, all coupled with an automatic gearbox. Its most powerful variant churns out an impressive 625 HP with a 4395 cm3 engine, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in a staggering 3.9 seconds. This beast of a vehicle also boasts an electric range of up to 97 km, thanks to its 25.7 kWh battery.
The Mazda CX-60, on the other hand, brings an engaging mix of plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV engines. Its top-tier plug-in hybrid engine offers 327 HP and accelerates to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds, complemented by an electric range of 64 km. With a maximum speed of 219 km/h, the CX-60 provides a balanced blend of performance and efficiency.
BMW's extensive powertrain lineup showcases a diverse range of fuel consumption figures. The plug-in hybrid variant shines with a consumption of just 0.9 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 21 g/km. The diesel models, however, still provide commendable efficiency with around 7.4 to 7.6 L/100 km.
The Mazda CX-60 delivers impressive fuel efficiency with its plug-in hybrid model consuming merely 1.4 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 32 g/km. Even the diesel variant presents an attractive option with a consumption of 5.4 L/100 km, making the CX-60 a prudent choice for eco-conscious buyers.
Space is a critical factor when choosing a family SUV. The BMW X5, with its slightly larger dimensions, offers a trunk capacity of 650 liters, allowing ample room for luggage and gear. The luxurious interior accommodations make it a splendid choice for comfortable journeys.
Mazda's CX-60, while slightly more compact, still provides a generous 570-liter trunk and a well-appointed cabin. Mazda's flair for elegant, driver-focused displays ensures a premium feel throughout, despite its smaller stance compared to the BMW X5.
Ultimately, the choice between the BMW X5 and the Mazda CX-60 will hinge on individual priorities. The BMW X5 caters to drivers seeking peak performance and a more extensive array of powerful engines with a decidedly premium touch. In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 provides a balanced blend of efficiency and practicality, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers who also value style.
Both the BMW X5 and Mazda CX-60 exhibit compelling strengths, demonstrating how innovation and design cater to diverse driving needs. Whichever path you choose, both SUVs promise to deliver remarkable driving experiences that resonate with today's automotive enthusiasts.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the BMW X5 costs 77,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,386 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X5 uses 3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW X5 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 105 km, about 42 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 offers substantially more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 298 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X5 delivers markedly more torque with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is a bit lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,240 kg. The difference is around 350 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X5 offers a bit more boot space – 650 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X5 carries moderately more – 705 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.
The BMW X5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
77,100 - 143,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
105 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
25.7 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
68 - 289 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,240 - 2,495 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,935 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,004 - 2,015 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,755 - 1,765 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,720 - 1,870 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
565 - 705 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España