Compare performance (327 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mazda CX-30?
Mazda SUVs have consistently impressed with their combination of style, performance, and innovation. The Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-60 are no exceptions, each bringing unique attributes to the SUV landscape. Let’s dive into what sets these two models apart.
The Mazda CX-30 fits into the compact SUV segment with its sleek design and compact dimensions. Measuring 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and standing at 1,540 mm in height, the CX-30 is well-suited for urban environments. It offers a spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 430 liters.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60, part of the larger SUV category, boasts more generous dimensions at 4,745 mm in length, 1,890 mm in width, and up to 1,688 mm in height. Its trunk is significantly larger, with a capacity of 570 liters, catering to those who require more cargo space.
The Mazda CX-30 offers a versatile selection of petrol mild hybrid engines with power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. These engines, paired with either a manual or automatic transmission, deliver a balanced performance with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time varying from 8.3 to 10.3 seconds. The CX-30's top speed ranges between 191 to 204 km/h and supports both front-wheel and all-wheel drive setups.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 takes performance to another level, featuring both plug-in hybrid and diesel mild hybrid engines. The power output peaks at an impressive 327 HP for the plug-in hybrid variant, delivering a spirited 0-100 km/h sprint in just 5.8 seconds. It also offers a maximum torque of up to 550 Nm and can reach a top speed of 219 km/h. All models come with automatic transmission, with options for all-wheel or rear-wheel drive.
For those prioritizing fuel economy, the Mazda CX-30 showcases consumption rates ranging between 5.7 and 6.6 liters per 100 km, with CO2 emissions from 129 to 148 g/km. It maintains an intermediate balance between performance and efficiency.
The Mazda CX-60, particularly the plug-in hybrid version, shines in this category with a combined fuel consumption as low as 1.4 liters per 100 km and impressive CO2 emissions of just 31 g/km. The electric-only range of 64 km further enhances its eco-credentials, making it a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers.
Both models are equipped with cutting-edge technology, emphasizing Mazda's commitment to safety and innovation. The CX-30 and CX-60 feature advanced driver-assistance systems, offering functionalities such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and emergency braking systems. Additionally, the intuitive infotainment systems in both models provide seamless connectivity and entertainment options.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-60 ultimately depends on your lifestyle and preference. The CX-30 offers an excellent balance of performance and practicality, perfect for those who desire a city-friendly SUV. However, if you are in need of a more spacious, powerful, and eco-friendly vehicle, the CX-60 stands out with its potent engine options and hybrid technology.
Whichever Mazda you choose, both the CX-30 and CX-60 epitomize Mazda's dedication to producing vehicles that are not only a joy to drive but also embrace a sustainable future.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,437 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 141 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 435 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more boot space – 570 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España