Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 3848 £.
As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 523 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a slight edge – offering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls a bit stronger with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slight lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 112 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers minimal more room – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs minimal better – up to 1726 L, which is about 16 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 somewhat takes the win – 612 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 103 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £38,100
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.