VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is somewhat cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,823 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 526 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is very slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 184 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.