VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly lighter

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,757 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 524 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 289 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries noticeably more – 612 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 123 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.