VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Ford Explorer EV comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Ford Explorer EV?

Mazda CX-6e vs Ford Explorer EV: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

details

Ford Explorer EV

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Explorer EV is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,648 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers a bit more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 118 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

Explorer EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is somewhat lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 209 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers very slightly more boot space – 472 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries clearly more – 585 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km
Mazda CX-6e
Ford Explorer EV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details

Ford Explorer EV

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

details
Mazda CX-6e
Ford Explorer EV

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,872 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
531 - 585 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.