VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda CX-6e vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 105 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is very slightly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more boot space – 585 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries visibly more – 526 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 141 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-6e
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Mazda CX-6e
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.