Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-6e vs Volvo EX60 comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Volvo EX60?
Mazda CX-6e vs Volvo EX60: Key differences
CX-6e
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-6e is visibly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,143 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 326 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.
EX60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 422 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers considerably more torque with 790 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 500 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX60 is very slightly lighter – 2,190 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 15 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX60 offers somewhat more boot space – 523 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX60 carries a bit more – 460 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £54,000
Volvo EX60
Mazda CX-6e
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.
details
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.
details
Mazda CX-6e
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
|
Price
54,000 - 70,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
|
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,205 kg
|
Curb weight
2,190 - 2,425 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 L
|
Trunk capacity
523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
Width
1,899 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
385 kg
|
Payload
435 - 460 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
258 HP
|
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
190 kW
|
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.