Compare performance (327 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Honda CR-V?
In the competitive world of SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 have carved their niches, offering distinct flavours of style, performance, and innovation. As we delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two popular models, potential buyers can gain insights into which vehicle might better suit their needs.
When it comes to performance, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its robust engine options. The model comes with a choice between a plug-in hybrid and a diesel MHEV, providing power outputs of 327 HP and 254 HP, respectively. These are complemented by torque figures of 500 Nm and 550 Nm, ensuring that the CX-80 doesn't just look powerful but also feels it on the road.
In contrast, the Honda CR-V offers a more modest power output with a maximum of 184 HP from its full hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. Torque-like figures, at 335 Nm, are respectable, promoting smooth and reliable performance suitable for everyday driving. The CR-V falls slightly behind in acceleration, with times ranging from 9 to 9.5 seconds to reach 100km/h, whereas the CX-80 can accomplish this in as little as 6.8 seconds.
Efficiency is where the CR-V shines. With consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km in its hybrid variations, it appeals to those concerned with eco-friendliness and operating costs. The electric range of 79 km for the CR-V's hybrid version is competitive, offering ample range for city commuting without engaging the gasoline engine.
The CX-80, while packing more power, also boasts an efficient plug-in hybrid with a consumption of 1.6 L/100km, along with a decent electric range of 60 km. Although slightly less efficient than the CR-V, this still presents a viable option for eco-aware consumers.
The Mazda CX-80 stretches to 4995 mm in length and offers seating for seven, making it the go-to choice for larger families and those who frequently travel with more passengers. The increased dimensions, however, result in a smaller trunk capacity at 258 liters compared to the CR-V's maximum of 617 liters, which may be a consideration for those prioritizing cargo space.
The Honda CR-V, slightly shorter at 4706 mm, seats five passengers and focuses on maximizing space efficiency. Its generous trunk capacity and compact dimensions provide a balance of practicality and comfort, while its sleek design makes it easy to maneuver and park.
Both vehicles are equipped with the latest technological features, from advanced safety systems to infotainment enhancements. The CR-V incorporates Honda’s acclaimed safety suite, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
The CX-80 matches this with Mazda's suite of cutting-edge safety and driver assistance technologies, along with a premium interior that reflects Mazda's focus on luxury-like refinement.
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-80 ultimately depends on individual priorities. The CR-V offers a superb balance of efficiency, practicality, and everyday reliability, perfect for those focused on economy and cargo space. Meanwhile, the CX-80 delivers vigorous performance and additional seating, ideal for those who prioritize power and capacity.
Both models represent impressive feats of engineering in the SUV category, each catering to distinct preferences and lifestyles in the automotive market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Honda CR-V is somewhat cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,557 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Honda CR-V offers visibly more range – reaching up to 78 km, about 18 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is somewhat lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 310 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers significantly more boot space – 617 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 359 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España