VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes Vito Bus comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 36,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes Vito Bus?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes Vito Bus: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

Mercedes Vito Bus

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes Vito Bus is noticeably cheaper – starting at 36,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,998 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Bus with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers considerably more range – reaching up to 370 km, about 310 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Vito Bus

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers visibly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 7.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Bus is barely lighter – 2,023 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers clearly more boot space – 1,390 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 1,132 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries markedly more – 1,077 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 427 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Bus is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,300
Vito Bus

Mercedes Vito Bus

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.7 - 10 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 248 - 370 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes Vito Bus
Mercedes V Class
VS
Think workhorse: the Mercedes Vito Bus is a rugged, no-nonsense people carrier that puts practicality, payload and value first — ideal for fleets or families who need space without fuss. The Mercedes V‑Class, by contrast, dresses the same basic idea in luxury leather, tech and a whisper-quiet ride, …
Ford Tourneo Custom
Mercedes Vito Bus
VS
Choosing between the Ford Tourneo Custom and the Mercedes Vito comes down to whether you prioritise practicality and value or refinement and brand prestige. The Tourneo Custom is a hard‑working, roomy people‑carrier with clever storage and lower running costs, while the Mercedes Vito (Tourer) …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes Vito Bus

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes Vito Bus

The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.

details
img-0323

Reviews Mercedes Vito Bus

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Juan Ramírez
8 Apr 2026, 04:49:28

Comfort, useful space and engine — all good. It only seats two occupants, unless you ask otherwise.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Mercedes Vito Bus
Nissan Primastar Bus
VS
Mercedes Vito Bus and Nissan Primastar Bus go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes Vito Bus

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 228 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
7
Seats
8
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
Length
-
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,890 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
140 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.