Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Symbioz comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Renault Symbioz?
Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Symbioz is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,643 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Renault Symbioz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Symbioz
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is substantially lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 772 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers considerably more boot space – 576 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 318 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 191 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
Renault Symbioz
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Renault Symbioz
The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.
details
Mazda CX-80
Renault Symbioz
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.