VS

Mazda CX-80 vs smart #5 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 646 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 39,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or smart #5?

Mazda CX-80 vs smart #5: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • very slightly lighter

smart #5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

smart #5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 39,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,986 £.

As for electric range, the smart #5 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 590 km, about 530 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

#5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #5 offers significantly more power – delivering 646 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 319 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #5 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #5 delivers noticeably more torque with 710 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is very slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #5 offers clearly more boot space – 630 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 372 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 148 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,300
#5

smart #5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 340 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 19.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 465 - 590 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-80
smart #5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

smart #5

The Smart #5 continues to build on the brand's legacy of compact and efficient urban vehicles, now infused with a more modern and stylish design. Its sleek appearance is complemented by a spacious interior, offering comfort without compromising its compact nature. This model is ideal for city dwellers seeking a blend of innovation, practicality, and style in their daily drives.

details
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-009 (1)
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-005
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-014
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-004

Reviews smart #5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Stefan
31 Jan 2026, 22:25:16

I spent a weekend with the Brabus #5 and I’m thrilled! Extremely quiet, even at just under 220 km/h. Very good ride comfort, especially if, like me, you prefer a softer setup for better suspension comfort!
Brutal acceleration that only really hits from about 50 km/h and culminates in a 0–200 km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds… There are almost no cars up to roughly 1,000 hp that are faster!
The actual charging performance is, I believe, the best of any passenger car available in the EU (only Zeekr shows a little more on paper, but probably not in real life) — it charges at peaks up to 425 kW! 10–80% in 13 minutes and 5–100% in 28 minutes.
The fit and finish are in places better than the Mercedes E‑Class...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stefan
4 Dec 2025, 21:11:24

Apart from the hopefully soon improved/reduced chimes and the horrendously hard-to-reach mute for the speed warning, the car is really a knockout!
Very, very quiet, comfortable, extremely fast (Brabus version), great build quality, great equipment!

Frequently compared as well

smart #5
Kia EV5
VS
The smart #5 and Kia EV5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BMW iX3
smart #5
VS
In the face-off between the BMW iX3 and the smart #5, the iX3 stands out with its luxurious appeal and performance-oriented engineering, characteristic of BMW's commitment to electric mobility. Meanwhile, the smart #5 offers an enticing package for urban dwellers with its compact design and …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mercedes GLB
smart #5
VS
The Mercedes GLB is a sensible, slightly boxy premium compact SUV that delivers real-world space, family practicality and a composed long-distance ride, while the smart #5 is a punchy electric crossover that trades rear-seat room for sharp styling, low running costs and urban agility. If you …
Tesla Model Y
smart #5
VS
The Tesla Model Y and smart #5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
XPeng G6
smart #5
VS
XPeng G6 and smart #5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
BYD Sealion 7
smart #5
VS
In the arena of electric SUVs, the BYD Sealion 7 and the smart #5 fiercely compete for dominance, each bringing unique attributes to the table. The BYD Sealion 7 impresses with its expansive range and robust performance, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize long-distance travel. …
Mazda CX-80
smart #5

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
39,300 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 19.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
465 - 590 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
74.4 - 94 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,378 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
630 L
Length
-
Length
4,695 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
1,705 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,530 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
475 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
340 - 646 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
373 - 710 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
250 - 475 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
smart
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.