Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Suzuki Vitara comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Suzuki Vitara?
Mazda CX-80 vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Vitara is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,757 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 366 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Vitara
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 243 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is substantially lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 876 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more boot space – 375 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 225 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Suzuki Vitara holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,600
Suzuki Vitara
Mazda CX-80
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Suzuki Vitara
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Mazda CX-80
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.