Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota C-HR comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Toyota C-HR?
Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota C-HR is clearly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,194 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 66 km, about 6 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
C-HR
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is significantly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 626 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more boot space – 447 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 189 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 225 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £29,100
Toyota C-HR
Mazda CX-80
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
Mazda CX-80
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.