VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 24,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Renault Symbioz?

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power

Renault Symbioz

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • visibly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Symbioz is visibly cheaper – starting at 24,400 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,420 £.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers very slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 9.1 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Symbioz is noticeably faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is noticeably lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 490 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers visibly more boot space – 576 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 226 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,682 L, about 527 L more than the Mazda MX-30.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries slightly more – 459 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda MX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,800
MX-30

Mazda MX-30

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 85 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
If you want a sensible, well-rounded family SUV you can actually drive home today, the Renault Austral is the clear choice — comfortable, efficient and unfussy. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a futuristic concept car full of show-stopping ideas and tech, perfect for gawking at motor shows but …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, …
Mazda MX-30
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Peugeot 3008 stands out with its striking design and agile handling, making it a popular choice among drivers seeking both style and performance. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz offers a glimpse into the future with its innovative electric …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving …
Peugeot 2008
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV segment, the Peugeot 2008 stands out with its stylish design and advanced technology features, making it an appealing choice for urban dwellers. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz showcases an innovative approach to mobility, emphasizing electric performance and …
Renault Symbioz
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure concept theatre — a bold, electric vision of autonomous living that dazzles with ideas rather than keys. The Renault Rafale, meanwhile, brings that drama back to the driveway as a stylish, coupe‑SUV you can actually buy: handsome, practical and exactly the kind of …
Kia Niro
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz present a fascinating contrast in the growing hybrid and electric vehicle market. With the Niro’s practical design and impressive fuel efficiency, it appeals to everyday drivers looking for reliability. In contrast, the futuristic Renault Symbioz pushes boundaries …
Mazda MX-30
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
4,413 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
1,575 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
Payload
402 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.