VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda MX-30 or Skoda Kamiq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kamiq has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9137 £.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 has a a bit edge – offering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs evident better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 76 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is clearly lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1849 kg. The difference is around 618 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers somewhat more room – 400 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs to a small extent better – up to 1395 L, which is about 240 L more than the Mazda MX-30.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq clearly perceptible takes the win – 539 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda MX-30 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £30,800
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres

Mazda MX-30

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.30 kWh
  • Electric Range : 85 km
details

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 is a compact crossover that combines unique design with an environmentally conscious approach. Its distinct exterior features a coupe-like silhouette and freestyle doors that offer practicality and style. Inside, the cabin boasts sustainable materials, creating a harmonious blend of modern aesthetics and eco-friendly innovation.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
rate

The Skoda Kamiq stands out in the compact SUV segment with its distinctive design and spacious interior. It offers a comfortable ride with advanced technology and safety features that make it suitable for both city driving and longer journeys. The Kamiq combines practicality with a touch of elegance, making it an appealing choice for those seeking a versatile vehicle.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Mazda MX-30
Skoda Kamiq
MX-30
Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
30800 - 37100 £
Price
21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1849 kg
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4241 mm
Width
1848 mm
Width
1793 mm
Height
1555 mm
Height
1562 mm
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
Payload
402 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
In the competitive small SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW Taigo both offer distinctive styles and impressive practicality. While the Kamiq boasts a more spacious interior and a user-friendly infotainment system, the Taigo captivates with its sleek coupe-like design and sporty handling. Drivers seeking versatility and comfort may lean towards the Kamiq, whereas those favoring aesthetics and a dynamic driving experience might prefer the Taigo.
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the burgeoning segment of compact SUVs, the SEAT Arona and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their unique designs and driving dynamics. While the Arona offers a sportier aesthetic and a slightly more engaging drive, the Kamiq emphasizes comfort and practicality, making it an excellent choice for families. Both models are equipped with a range of tech features, ensuring they are well-suited to modern driving demands.
Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a robust yet comfortable drive with a well-appointed interior, catering to those who prioritize practicality and style in urban settings.
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
In the battle of the Skoda Kamiq versus the Skoda Scala, buyers find themselves torn between functionality and style. The Kamiq, with its elevated stance and compact SUV appeal, offers a commanding driving position, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Scala impresses with its sleek hatchback design and spacious interior, catering to those who prioritize a dynamic driving experience and practicality in one refined package.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride height, perfect for those seeking versatility in both city and country driving. Ultimately, the choice between these two Skoda vehicles boils down to personal preference, with each catering to distinct needs and lifestyles.
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and spacious interior, ideal for families and city dwellers seeking comfort and versatility.
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Vitara stand out in the competitive compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths. The Kamiq impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology features, catering to those who prioritize comfort and connectivity. Meanwhile, the Vitara boasts robust off-road capabilities and a reliable performance, making it a solid choice for those who value adventure and dependability.
Vauxhall Frontera
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the intense showdown between the Opel Frontera and the Skoda Kamiq, the rugged charm of the Frontera meets the modern practicality of the Kamiq. While the Frontera offers an adventurous spirit with its off-road capabilities, the Kamiq impresses with its efficient use of space and advanced technology features. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles hinges on whether you prioritize classic durability or contemporary versatility in your driving experience.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.