@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Mazda MX-30 vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30800 £ vs 26400 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or VW T-Roc?

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

VW T-Roc

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4410 £.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 has a a bit edge – offering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 72 km/h.

MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is clearly perceptible lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1849 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers distinct more room – 475 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs slightly better – up to 1350 L, which is about 195 L more than the Mazda MX-30.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc clearly perceptible takes the win – 515 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda MX-30 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda MX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £30,800
MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda MX-30

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.30 kWh
  • Electric Range : 85 km
details
Mazda MX-30
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

VW T-Roc

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Mazda MX-30
VW T-Roc
MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
30800 - 37100 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1849 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1848 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1555 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
402 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota Corolla Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities that cater to varying driver preferences. The Corolla Cross emphasizes reliability and practicality with its spacious interior and fuel-efficient hybrid options, while the T-Roc offers a …
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.