VS

McLaren GT Series vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (635 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (175,700 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – McLaren GT Series or Renault Arkana?

McLaren GT Series vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

McLaren GT Series

  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GT Series

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the McLaren GT Series costs 175,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 147,257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the McLaren GT Series with 11.9 L/100km. The difference is about 7.2 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the McLaren GT Series offers significantly more power – delivering 635 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 492 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the McLaren GT Series is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 7.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the McLaren GT Series delivers considerably more torque with 630 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 425 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is very slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,520 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
McLaren GT Series
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

McLaren GT Series

The McLaren GT takes the supercar blueprint and stretches it into a grand tourer, marrying thrilling pace with genuine long-distance comfort and a cabin that’s actually liveable. If you crave weekend escape capability without surrendering driver engagement, this is the car to consider — though it does attract a fair share of admiring glances.

details
serpimg_XPZRKv

Reviews McLaren GT Series

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
VS
In the burgeoning world of crossover SUVs, the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana both offer distinctive styles and robust performance. The Peugeot 408 captivates with its sharp design and intuitive technology features, providing a smooth yet dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Arkana or the …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Arkana
VS
Hyundai Kona and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Hyundai Kona or the …
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Kia Niro and Renault Arkana both offer distinct advantages. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, catering to environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana captivates with …
McLaren GT Series
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
175,700 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
270 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
420 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,045 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
-
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
635 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
630 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
467 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
3,994 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
McLaren
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the McLaren GT Series have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.