VS

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (131 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Renault Clio?

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Mercedes Citan Transporter

details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Citan Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mercedes Citan Transporter costs 21,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,684 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mercedes Citan Transporter with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers a bit more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Citan Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is somewhat lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,381 kg. The difference is around 179 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan Transporter carries substantially more – 787 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 324 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Citan Transporter is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,700
Citan Transporter

Mercedes Citan Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 131 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 262 - 290 km
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Citan Transporter

The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 156 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 787 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.