Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (544 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (93900 £ vs 69800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Volvo XC90?
EQS
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo XC90 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 69800 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 93900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24138 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS performs convincingly better – achieving up to 816 km, about 745 km more than the Volvo XC90.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS has a a bit edge – offering 544 HP compared to 455 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQS performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS pulls a bit stronger with 858 Nm compared to 709 Nm. That’s about 149 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
EQS
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Volvo XC90 is evident lighter – 2080 kg compared to 2545 kg. The difference is around 465 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers convincingly more room – 610 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 308 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs minimal better – up to 1856 L, which is about 86 L more than the Mercedes EQS.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 evident takes the win – 710 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQS
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £93,900
Mercedes EQS
Mercedes EQS
The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
details
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Mercedes EQS
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93900 - 123500 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
790 - 816 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2545 - 2655 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
5223 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1926 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1770 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
550 - 565 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 544 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 858 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
265 - 400 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQS have?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.