VS

MG HS vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG HS or Toyota C-HR+?

MG HS vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

HS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG HS is noticeably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers significantly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 507 km more than the MG HS.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers markedly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG HS delivers barely more torque with 350 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

HS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is marginally lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG HS offers somewhat more boot space – 507 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries visibly more – 655 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 255 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
MG HS
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Fresh from BYD’s EV revolution, the sleek Seal U brings range, tech and bold styling to spar with the MG HS/EHS — MG’s faithful family crossover offered as a petrol and a plug‑in hybrid that plays the safe, sensible card. Which one gives you the best mix of space, running costs and grin‑per‑mile?
MG HS
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
100 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
14 - 126 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
507 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
400 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the MG HS have?

The MG HS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.