VS

MG MG4 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (435 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG4 or Skoda Enyaq?

MG MG4 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

MG MG4

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG4

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Both models are evenly matched in price – each starts at 36,800 £ .

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.1 kWh/100km for the MG MG4. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 44 km more than the MG MG4.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 offers noticeably more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers a bit more torque with 679 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 79 Nm more.

MG4

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG4 is slightly lighter – 1,755 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries moderately more – 526 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG MG4 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
MG4

MG MG4

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 405 - 545 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
Think of the MG4 as the affordable hot hatch of the EV world — compact, sharp-handling and great value for drivers who want a little grin in every corner, while the BYD Atto 2 is a chilled crossover, taller, roomier and packed with clever tech and impressive real-world range. If you want lively …
MG MG4
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG4

The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.

details
MG.027.STUDIO
MG.028.STUDIO
MG.036.STUDIO
MG.038_0.STUDIO

Reviews MG MG4

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:19:27

The MG4 seems more versatile to me than the Dolphin, which relies mainly on design. The MG4 has proven itself and remains an excellent used option with low mileage.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angio
12 Jan 2026, 12:26:30

Superb

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sal
23 Oct 2025, 20:41:36

I tried it today and found the car genuinely pleasant and comfortable to drive.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG4 is a zippy compact EV that fizzes through town with sharp handling, clever packaging and an attractive price — perfect if you want fun, efficiency and a bit of character in your daily commute. By contrast the MG MGS5 EV trades some of that cheeky agility for a taller, more spacious and …
MG MG4
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
Comparing the MG4 and the BYD Dolphin Surf gives you a clear look at two affordable electric hatchbacks that target practical daily use but take very different approaches to range, interior space and driving character. If you want a compact EV that leans toward sharp handling and a sporty layout, …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Kia EV3
MG MG4
VS
Comparing the Kia EV3 and the MG4 pits two compact electric cars against each other that aim to deliver solid range, practical interiors and strong value. Choosing between the Kia EV3’s comfort-and-practicality focus and the MG4’s sportier driving character mostly comes down to whether you prefer …
MG MG4
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 40,300 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 - 545 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,755 - 1,810 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,836 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
448 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 435 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 600 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 320 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Skoda
Is the MG MG4 offered with different drivetrains?

The MG MG4 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.