VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Master Transporter comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Master Transporter?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

Renault Master Transporter

  • only slightly more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi ASX is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,885 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

Master Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Master Transporter offers only slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mitsubishi ASX offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is significantly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 832 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries considerably more – 1,846 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,401 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Mitsubishi ASX and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward, durable value and simple packaging (ASX) or a more stylish, configurable small SUV with clever cabin packaging and tech (Captur). I’ll quickly compare how they stack up for space, …
Mercedes Sprinter Bus
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Mercedes Sprinter Bus and Renault Master Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Comparing the ASX and Vitara helps buyers choose between two compact SUVs with different strengths: the ASX leans toward comfort and value, while the Vitara emphasizes nimble handling and fuel efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in space, safety, economy and driving feel so you can …
Honda HR-V
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi ASX both bring unique strengths to the table. The HR-V shines with its sleek design and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a standout choice for urban drivers who value style and economy. On the other hand, the ASX offers robust …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX stands out with its robust design and practicality, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris Cross combines sporty aesthetics with impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers …
Fiat Ducato
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In the world of versatile transport vans, the Fiat Ducato and the Renault Master both offer impressive utility, yet they cater to slightly different needs. The Ducato stands out with its robust engine options and efficient fuel economy, making it ideal for long-haul delivery businesses. On the …
Mercedes Sprinter Transporter
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In this head-to-head transporter showdown, the Mercedes Sprinter and Renault Master prove to be two formidable contenders in the commercial vehicle market. The Mercedes Sprinter is renowned for its luxurious interiors and advanced safety features, making it a favorite for businesses that prioritize …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Renault Master Transporter
VW Crafter
VS
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Renault Master Transporter and VW Crafter stand out for their versatility and capacity. While the Master offers a range of customizable configurations and a strong payload, the Crafter impresses with its advanced technology and superior driving …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 318 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.