VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21400 £ vs 26400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or VW T-Roc?

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi ASX has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5018 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a barely noticeable edge – offering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.90 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs slightly better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is somewhat lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 169 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers slight more room – 484 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1458 L, which is about 108 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc slightly takes the win – 515 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mitsubishi ASX
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium
DB2022AU00088_medium
DB2022AU00086_medium
DB2022AU00095_medium

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Mitsubishi ASX
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
21400 - 32500 £
Price
26400 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4373 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1458 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
196 - 212 km/h
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Kia Sportage
VW T-Roc
VS
The Kia Sportage piles on space, comfort and kit — plus that mighty warranty — making family life a breeze, while the VW T-Roc counters with tidier dimensions, sharper steering and a dash of VW polish for city duty. If you want maximum value and long-haul calm, go Sportage; if you crave a nimble …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology …
Honda HR-V
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Honda HR-V and VW T-Roc stand out with their distinct design and functionality. While the HR-V is praised for its spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the T-Roc offers a more sporty aesthetic and advanced tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family SUV — roomy, practical and quietly clever with storage solutions that make everyday life easier, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more driver-focused alternative with sharper handling and a cooler look. Choose the Karoq for straight-up value and comfort on …
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.