What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mitsubishi ASX's engine?

Up to 158 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Mitsubishi ASX use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.40 L.

How fast can the Mitsubishi ASX go?

The Mitsubishi ASX reaches up to 180 km/h.

How big is the Mitsubishi ASX overall?

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4239 mm long, 1797 mm wide and 1575 mm high.

Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

How fast can the VW T-Roc go?

The VW T-Roc reaches up to 212 km/h.

What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 475 L fit inside.

How big is the VW T-Roc overall?

The VW T-Roc measures 4271 mm long, 1811 mm wide and 1527 mm high.

Mitsubishi ASX vs VW T-Roc – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi ASX has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 5876 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a barely noticeable edge – offering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs slightly better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 270 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is somewhat lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 169 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers slight more room – 484 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs a bit better – up to 1596 L, which is about 246 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc slightly takes the win – 515 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Audi AG

Audi Q3

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20600 - 32500 £	Price 26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 99 - 135 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 48 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 5	Doors 2 - 5
Curb weight 1296 - 1493 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 348 - 484 L	Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Length 4239 mm	Length 4271 - 4373 mm
Width 1797 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1575 mm	Height 1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity 1458 - 1596 L	Max trunk capacity 1350 L
Payload 397 - 449 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 91 - 158 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 14 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 168 - 180 km/h	Max Speed 187 - 212 km/h
Torque 160 - 270 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 67 - 116 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1789 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3