VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Renault Symbioz?

Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is visibly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,523 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Renault Symbioz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Symbioz offers only slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Symbioz is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Symbioz delivers visibly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is moderately lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,359 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers visibly more boot space – 576 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 185 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries somewhat more – 459 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Symbioz leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,700
Symbioz

Renault Symbioz

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
All-New COLT_003

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Symbioz
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a straight fight between Renault’s dreamy Symbioz and Dacia’s pragmatic Bigster, the Symbioz seduces with living‑room luxury and sci‑fi tech while the Bigster scores on honest space, rugged bones and a price tag you can actually imagine. If you want a show‑stopping concept that imagines the …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Peugeot 3008 and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different takes on modern motoring: the 3008 is a production compact SUV known for its practicality and refined interior, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward‑looking concept showcasing electric, autonomous and connected technologies. …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Renault Symbioz
VW T-Roc
VS
Comparing the Renault Symbioz and the Volkswagen T‑Roc pits Renault's Symbioz concept — a forward-looking electric and autonomous showcase — against the T‑Roc, Volkswagen's practical compact crossover for everyday use. This short comparison will help you decide whether you're drawn to cutting-edge …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
4,053 mm
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
1,439 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Colt have?

The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.