VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs Skoda Karoq comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Skoda Karoq?

Mitsubishi Colt vs Skoda Karoq: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • a bit lighter

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,920 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Karoq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers markedly more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Karoq is somewhat faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers clearly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is a bit lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers clearly more boot space – 521 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 130 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,630 L, about 561 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries markedly more – 549 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 164 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Karoq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
Karoq

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Mitsubishi Colt
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
serpimg_IA2rJY

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Karoq

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494

Reviews Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
Skoda Karoq
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
We line up the Skoda Karoq against the Toyota Corolla Cross to settle which compact SUV deserves your keys. The Karoq brings clever Czech packaging and Euro finesse, while the Corolla Cross answers with Toyota’s rock‑solid reliability and wallet‑friendly running costs—so read on if you prefer …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the Skoda Enyaq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q3
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq stand out with their distinct character and appeal. While the Q3 offers a luxurious interior and advanced tech features that cater to premium buyers, the Karoq impresses with its practicality and value for money, making it a …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mitsubishi Colt
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
4,053 mm
Length
4,390 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Height
1,439 mm
Height
1,624 mm
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Max trunk capacity
1,630 L
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
192 - 210 km/h
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Colt have?

The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.