Compare performance (218 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Toyota C-HR are reputable contenders, offering style, efficiency, and performance. Both models are engineered to meet modern demands, boasting hybrid technologies that merge performance with environmental consciousness. Let’s dive deeper into the specifics to see how these two models fare against each other.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross presents itself with a robust SUV stance, measuring 4545 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1685 mm in height. It is designed with practicality in mind, featuring a body type that fits neatly into the SUV category, providing ample room for passengers and luggage alike with a trunk capacity of 359 liters.
On the flip side, the Toyota C-HR offers a more compact footprint, at 4362 mm in length, 1832 mm in width, and with varying heights between 1558 mm and 1564 mm, depending on the model. Despite its slightly smaller size, it maximizes space utilization with a trunk capacity ranging from 350 to 447 liters, ensuring it remains equally practical for daily use.
The Eclipse Cross is available as a plug-in hybrid, equipped with a 2360 cm3 engine, delivering a respectable 188 HP (138 kW) through an all-wheel-drive system. It achieves an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 10.9 seconds, reaching a top speed of 162 km/h. The efficiency-orientated design allows the Eclipse Cross to consume just 2 L/100km, making it a formidable contender in terms of fuel economy, bolstered by an electric range of 45 km.
The Toyota C-HR, however, offers more versatility with both full and plug-in hybrid options. Its power output varies between 140 HP and an impressive 223 HP (164 kW), with corresponding acceleration times between 7.4 to 9.9 seconds. C-HR models are capable of achieving top speeds of up to 180 km/h while maintaining efficiency with consumption as low as 0.8 L/100km on hybrid-electric versions, and an extended electric range of up to 68 km.
Both vehicles embrace contemporary technological advancements. The Eclipse Cross is fitted with comprehensive infotainment systems and connectivity options, catering to tech-savvy drivers and ensuring a seamless in-drive experience. Its hybrid technology emphasizes Mitsubishi’s commitment to sustainable motoring.
The Toyota C-HR stands out with its advanced drivetrain options and CVT transmission system, designed to enhance driving dynamics and fuel efficiency. Its range of hybrid technologies caters to different driving preferences, reflecting Toyota’s leadership in hybrid innovation.
Passenger comfort is a priority for both vehicles, with each model seating up to five passengers. The Eclipse Cross offers a quiet and smooth ride, prioritizing ride comfort across varying terrains through its all-wheel-drive configuration. In contrast, the C-HR comes with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, providing flexibility in terms of handling and driving preference.
In this comparison, both the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Toyota C-HR demonstrate strong qualities that cater to a range of consumer needs. Those seeking a slightly larger, more rugged vehicle with impressive hybrid efficiency might lean towards the Eclipse Cross. Meanwhile, the C-HR provides a dynamic driving experience, advanced hybrid systems, and more customizable options, making it a compelling choice for those prioritizing innovation and versatility.
Ultimately, the decision between these two vehicles will come down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs, as both are strong contenders in the competitive SUV segment.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota C-HR is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,000 £.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers considerably more range – reaching up to 635 km, about 569 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers only slightly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers barely more boot space – 487 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.
details
The Toyota C-HR wraps efficient hybrid drivetrains in dramatic, European‑tuned styling and a noticeably upmarket cabin, delivering composed ride quality and easy city manners that suit style‑minded commuters and company drivers. Accept a tighter, dim rear seat, a fiddly high‑lip boot and occasional CVT grumble plus persistent warning chimes, and you get a very economical, confident little crossover that prizes individuality over outright practicality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
635 km
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
487 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4,489 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,908 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España