VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Omoda 5?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,123 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers significantly more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 153 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers considerably more torque with 340 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 238 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 681 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Omoda 5 offers noticeably more boot space – 350 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries noticeably more – 536 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 136 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Mitsubishi Space Star
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the VW T‑Roc pits a stylish, tech-rich newcomer against a proven, versatile compact SUV from Volkswagen. I’ll compare their design, interiors, driving dynamics, practicality and running costs so you can clearly see which one suits your priorities.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 3008
VS
Comparing the Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 3008 pits a bold, value-focused newcomer against a more established, refined compact SUV with a stronger brand pedigree. I’ll walk you through the key differences in design, driving dynamics, practicality and features so you can decide which suits your needs …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 2008 are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want stylish urban SUVs with modern tech—Omoda 5 focuses on bold design and strong equipment-for-the-price, while the 2008 leans on European refinement and sharper handling. This comparison will help you decide whether you …
CUPRA Formentor
Omoda 5
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Omoda 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Omoda
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.