VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Master Transporter comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Renault Master Transporter?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Renault Master Transporter

  • clearly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,999 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

Master Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Master Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Master Transporter is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 13.5 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers significantly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 278 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 1,188 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries substantially more – 1,846 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,446 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Master Transporter holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Master Transporter

Renault Master Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 177 - 448 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Aygo
VS
In the competitive realm of compact city cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo stand out with their unique blend of style and efficiency. The Space Star offers a surprisingly spacious interior and excellent fuel economy, making it a practical choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Aygo …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Master Transporter
VW Crafter
VS
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Renault Master Transporter and VW Crafter stand out for their versatility and capacity. While the Master offers a range of customizable configurations and a strong payload, the Crafter impresses with its advanced technology and superior driving …
Fiat Ducato
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In the world of versatile transport vans, the Fiat Ducato and the Renault Master both offer impressive utility, yet they cater to slightly different needs. The Ducato stands out with its robust engine options and efficient fuel economy, making it ideal for long-haul delivery businesses. On the …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Mercedes Sprinter Transporter
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In this head-to-head transporter showdown, the Mercedes Sprinter and Renault Master prove to be two formidable contenders in the commercial vehicle market. The Mercedes Sprinter is renowned for its luxurious interiors and advanced safety features, making it a favorite for businesses that prioritize …
Mercedes Sprinter Bus
Renault Master Transporter
VS
The Mercedes Sprinter Bus and Renault Master Transporter compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Hyundai i20
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the compact hatchback segment, the Hyundai i20 stands out with its modern design and tech-savvy interior, offering features that cater to tech enthusiasts. In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star provides practicality and excellent fuel efficiency, making it an appealing choice for …
Peugeot Boxer
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Peugeot Boxer and Renault Master Transporter stand out as top contenders. Both vans offer impressive cargo space and versatile configurations, catering to a variety of business needs. While the Boxer is praised for its nimble handling and fuel …
Fiat Panda
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
When pitting the Fiat Panda against the Mitsubishi Space Star, city driving enthusiasts will find distinct advantages in each. The Fiat Panda impresses with its compact design and playful demeanor, making it an ideal choice for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
0 - 318 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.