VS

Nissan Micra vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24,000 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Micra or Renault Clio?

Nissan Micra vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Nissan Micra

  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Micra

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Nissan Micra costs 24,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers very slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Micra is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Micra delivers noticeably more torque with 245 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is markedly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,452 kg. The difference is around 250 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries slightly more – 463 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Micra stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
Micra

Nissan Micra

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 317 - 416 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Nissan Micra
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details
serpimg_LJ8L9f

Reviews Nissan Micra

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Inster
Nissan Micra
VS
The Hyundai Inster hustles through town with roomy practicality and wallet-friendly running costs, while the Nissan Micra scores points for sharper handling, cheeky styling and a more engaging turbo feel. For no-nonsense commuting pick the Inster; if you crave personality and a bit of fun behind …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Fiat 600
Nissan Micra
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Nissan Micra means choosing between Italian flair and simple, city-friendly packaging versus the Micra’s modern practicality and refinement. This comparison examines size, performance, economy, comfort and running costs so you can pick the small car that fits …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Clio and Yaris are two of Europe’s most popular superminis, each offering smart urban agility and efficient engines. Choosing between the Clio and Yaris comes down to whether you want the Clio’s stylish cabin and sharper handling or the Yaris’s proven reliability and hybrid efficiency.
Nissan Micra
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,774 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
403 - 408 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Nissan Micra?

The Nissan Micra is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.