What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Omoda 5's engine?

Up to 204 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Omoda 5 use?

On average, the Omoda 5 consumes 7.50 L.

How fast can the Omoda 5 go?

The Omoda 5 reaches up to 220 km/h.

How big is the Omoda 5 overall?

Length 4424 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1588 mm – those are the dimensions of the Omoda 5.

What drivetrain options does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar have?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar deliver on the road?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches a peak output of 404 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.80 L.

How many kWh does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 15.40 kWh.

How fast can the Land Rover Range Rover Velar go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 250 km/h.

What is the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 552 L fit inside.

What are the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4797 mm long, 1933 mm wide and 1657 mm high.

Omoda 5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Velar manages with 4.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.

Range Rover Velar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a significantly edge – offering 404 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 200 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.80 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Omoda 5 tops out at 220 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls convincingly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers decisively more room – 552 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 552 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs noticeable better – up to 1358 L, which is about 283 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Top Car Comparisons

Omoda 5

Opel Mokka

VS

The Omoda 5 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Omoda 5

MG MGS5 EV

VS

Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 £	Price 61900 - 87400 £
Consumption L/100km 7.50 L	Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 10.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 63 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 15.40 kWh
co2 -	co2 110 - 232 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 62 - 83 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight -	Curb weight 2003 - 2280 kg
Trunk capacity 0 L	Trunk capacity 503 - 552 L
Length 4424 mm	Length 4797 mm
Width 1830 mm	Width 1933 mm
Height 1588 mm	Height 1657 - 1665 mm
Max trunk capacity 1075 L	Max trunk capacity 1335 - 1358 L
Payload -	Payload 460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 HP	Power HP 204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.80 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed 220 km/h	Max Speed 209 - 250 km/h
Torque 290 Nm	Torque 430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 145 kW	Power kW 150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1997 - 2997 cm3