VS

Omoda 5 vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or MG ZS?

Omoda 5 vs MG ZS: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

5

MG ZS vs Omoda 5: the real‑world comparison buyers care about

The MG ZS and Omoda 5 target the same small‑SUV shopper, but they go about it very differently. In MG ZS VS Omoda 5 terms, the MG leans on space, simplicity and price, while the Omoda banks on glossy tech, safety credentials and a calmer high‑speed manner. The MG ZS feels like a straightforward family tool that happens to be well equipped; the Omoda 5 feels more showroom‑seductive, with an emphasis on screens and kit. Your choice here hinges less on brochure specs and more on how you use your car day to day.

ZS

Space and practicality for family duty

If you regularly carry adults or lanky teens, the MG ZS is the easier fit in the back and its boot swallows more without a game of Tetris. Doors open wide, ISOFIX points are easy to reach, and the loading floor can be set up to keep things nearly flat, even if underfloor stash space is limited and the parcel shelf is a bit clumsy. The Omoda 5’s rear bench and headroom feel tighter, and its boot is shallower, so bulkier pushchairs or holiday luggage demand more compromise. Couples or small families will be fine in the Omoda 5, but school‑run and big‑shop duty simply feel less fussy in the MG ZS.

Ride comfort and long‑distance calm

On smoother roads the MG ZS is comfortable enough, but at town speeds its firmer edge lets sharp bumps and joints through, and motorway noise creeps in sooner. The Omoda 5 settles more quietly at a cruise and takes the edge off wind and road roar, which makes longer journeys feel less wearing. Over undulations, though, the Omoda 5 can float and gently bob where the MG ZS stays tied down, so choose based on what bothers you more: firmness or float. If you do big motorway miles, the Omoda 5 is the more relaxing companion; if your routes are mixed and you prefer tighter body control, the MG ZS has the steadier gait.

City manners and everyday drivability

In town the MG ZS’s hybrid‑like step‑off is smooth and fuss‑free, visibility is generous, and its straightforward controls make parking intuitive. The Omoda 5 counters with crisp cameras that help in tight spaces, but the view out the back is more compromised and speed bumps can set the body into a soft wobble. Go for the Omoda 5 Hybrid and it shuffles around more smoothly; the petrol is less polished in stop‑start traffic. If your week is mostly urban errands, the MG ZS feels easier to gel with immediately, while the Omoda 5 leans on its driver aids to balance out its visibility and ride quirks.

Cabin feel, tech and usability

The Omoda 5 wins the showroom walk‑up with big, bright screens and a richer‑looking design, and up front the seats are easy to get comfy in. Living with it, the layered menus and small touch targets take learning, and its safety beeps can be over‑eager until you dig through settings. The MG ZS looks and feels simpler, with tougher plastics and fewer frills, but core functions are clear, and its driver‑assist tuning tends to stay in the background. Tech‑hungry buyers will enjoy the Omoda 5’s flashier interface; value‑driven users may prefer the MG ZS’s honest vibe, even if it lacks modern wireless niceties.

Value, ownership and who each suits best

The MG ZS undercuts the Omoda 5 meaningfully, yet still brings generous kit and a long warranty, so cost‑conscious buyers can stop spreadsheeting and start driving. The Omoda 5 answers with its own lengthy warranty, a strong safety rating and a more hushed motorway demeanour, especially as a Hybrid. Efficiency plays out differently: the MG ZS shines in town and mixed use, while the Omoda 5 Hybrid feels calmer and thriftier than its petrol sibling on longer stretches. If you want maximum space and minimum outlay, the MG ZS is the sensible pick; if you prioritise safety credentials, quiet cruising and a tech‑forward cabin, the Omoda 5 makes the stronger case before you dive into the numbers in the technical comparison.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,780 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers a bit more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers considerably more torque with 340 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 192 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is markedly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 291 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG ZS offers noticeably more boot space – 443 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries somewhat more – 536 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details
Omoda 5
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
Omoda 5
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Omoda
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.