VS

Omoda 5 vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (204 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Renault Arkana?

Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Renault Arkana

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5315 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 2.80 L per 100 km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 has a distinct edge – offering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Omoda 5 performs noticeable better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Omoda 5 pulls distinct stronger with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers decisively more room – 480 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 480 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Arkana performs to a small extent better – up to 1263 L, which is about 188 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Omoda 5
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.70 L
details

Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Renault Arkana

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Renault Arkana

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Omoda 5
Opel Mokka
VS
The Omoda 5 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Omoda 5
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.50 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
-
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4424 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1830 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1588 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1075 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
-
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
220 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and the Omoda 5 present a compelling matchup, each vying for dominance with their distinct attributes. The Qashqai, renowned for its reliability and refined driving dynamics, offers a well-rounded package with enhanced safety features and improved …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
MG ZS and Omoda 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
The Omoda 5 and MG HS offer compelling choices in the competitive compact SUV segment, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Omoda 5 impresses with its avant-garde design and tech-savvy interior, packed with features that appeal to modern, tech-oriented drivers. In contrast, the MG HS …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
CUPRA Formentor
Omoda 5
VS
Unsure whether the CUPRA Formentor or the Omoda 5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.