VS

Omoda 5 vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Renault Arkana?

Omoda 5 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more efficient
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Omoda 5 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,315 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers markedly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£23,142
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Omoda 5
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the compact-crossover ring the Nissan Qashqai plays the reliable all‑rounder — comfortable ride, polished interior and a strong dealer network that makes it an easy, practical buy for families. The Omoda 5 is the flashy newcomer: dramatic design, generous tech kit and excellent value, but you …
Omoda 5
MG HS/EHS
VS
Omoda 5 and MG HS/EHS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the Omoda 5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
In the rapidly evolving compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Omoda 5 showcase distinct strengths catering to diverse consumer needs. The Tucson impresses with its refined design, a suite of advanced safety features, and a reputation for reliability, positioning it as a versatile and …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 3008
VS
Omoda 5 and Peugeot 3008 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Omoda 5
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,424 mm
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
1,588 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,075 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
-
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.