VS

Omoda 5 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Omoda 5 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 250,629 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 uses 5.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 10.7 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers considerably more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 376 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is considerably lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,039 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers noticeably more boot space – 555 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries visibly more – 840 kg compared to 536 kg. That’s a difference of about 304 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Omoda 5
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the VW T‑Roc pits a stylish, tech-rich newcomer against a proven, versatile compact SUV from Volkswagen. I’ll compare their design, interiors, driving dynamics, practicality and running costs so you can clearly see which one suits your priorities.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 3008
VS
Comparing the Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 3008 pits a bold, value-focused newcomer against a more established, refined compact SUV with a stronger brand pedigree. I’ll walk you through the key differences in design, driving dynamics, practicality and features so you can decide which suits your needs …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 2008 are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want stylish urban SUVs with modern tech—Omoda 5 focuses on bold design and strong equipment-for-the-price, while the 2008 leans on European refinement and sharper handling. This comparison will help you decide whether you …
CUPRA Formentor
Omoda 5
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Omoda 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.