Compare performance (224 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Skoda Kamiq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the dynamic world of SUVs, the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq stand out as two formidable contenders. Both models offer a combination of modern engineering and innovative features, but which one holds the edge? Let's delve into a detailed comparison, exploring their technical specifications and innovative design elements.
The Omoda 5 is known for its powerful performance, boasting a robust 1.6-liter engine that delivers 204 horsepower (HP) and 145 kW of power. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds and achieves a top speed of 220 km/h. This makes it a spirited choice for drivers seeking a dynamic ride.
Contrastingly, the Skoda Kamiq presents a range of engine options, with power outputs ranging from 95 HP to 150 HP, depending on the variant chosen. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 8.3 to 11 seconds, while the top speed peaks at 214 km/h. While less powerful than the Omoda 5, the Kamiq offers versatility and efficiency suited for varied driving styles.
Fuel efficiency plays a crucial role in modern automotive design. The Omoda 5 consumes approximately 7.5 L/100km. Although it delivers impressive power, its consumption may be a consideration for those focused on fuel savings.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq provides better fuel efficiency with options ranging between 5.4 L/100km to 5.7 L/100km. Moreover, the Kamiq boasts a CO2 efficiency class D and CO2 emissions starting from 121 g/km, making it a favorable option for environmentally conscious drivers.
Both the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq fall within the compact SUV category. The Omoda 5 measures 4,424 mm in length, 1,830 mm in width, and 1,588 mm in height, offering a spacious interior with five seats.
The Skoda Kamiq is slightly more compact with dimensions of 4,241 mm in length, 1,793 mm in width, and 1,562 mm in height. Despite its smaller size, it provides an ample trunk capacity of 400 L, compared to the Omoda 5’s lesser trunk space. Design-wise, both vehicles encapsulate modern aesthetics tailored to urban environments.
Technology and innovation are at the forefront of both models. The Omoda 5 features a dual-clutch automatic transmission, ensuring smooth gear transitions and enhancing driving dynamics. Its cutting-edge features cater to tech-savvy individuals seeking a contemporary driving experience.
The Skoda Kamiq offers flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options. It integrates state-of-the-art infotainment systems and advanced driver-assistance capabilities, presenting a wide array of options for drivers prioritizing convenience and safety.
The Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq each have their own merits. The Omoda 5 is ideal for those who prioritize performance and power, while the Skoda Kamiq stands out for its fuel efficiency and practical design. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on driving preferences, lifestyle needs, and desired innovations.
As the SUV landscape evolves, choosing between the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq is a decision influenced by a dynamic blend of performance, efficiency, and modernity. Whichever you choose, you're acquiring a vehicle that embodies the spirit of contemporary automotive excellence.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kamiq is a bit cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,503 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.3 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers noticeably more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers markedly more torque with 340 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is visibly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers somewhat more boot space – 400 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries marginally more – 539 kg compared to 536 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.
The Omoda 5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.
details
The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
430 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 120 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
431 - 536 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Omoda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España