What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Omoda 5's engine?

Up to 204 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Omoda 5 use?

On average, the Omoda 5 consumes 7.50 L.

How fast can the Omoda 5 go?

The Omoda 5 reaches up to 220 km/h.

How big is the Omoda 5 overall?

Length 4424 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1588 mm – those are the dimensions of the Omoda 5.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

How large is the Skoda Kodiaq’s battery?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Omoda 5 vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which car gives you more for your money? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 13706 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 7.10 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.80 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Omoda 5 tops out at 220 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 910 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – up to 2105 L, which is about 1030 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota RAV4

VS

If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 £	Price 36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km 7.50 L	Consumption L/100km 0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh
co2 -	co2 9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight -	Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity 0 L	Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L
Length 4424 mm	Length 4758 - 4761 mm
Width 1830 mm	Width 1864 mm
Height 1588 mm	Height 1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity 1075 L	Max trunk capacity 1945 - 2105 L
Payload -	Payload 460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 HP	Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.80 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed 220 km/h	Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h
Torque 290 Nm	Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 145 kW	Power kW 110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3