VS

Omoda 5 vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Volvo EX90?

Omoda 5 vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,391 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Omoda 5 is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 190 km more than the Omoda 5.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 456 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 530 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is significantly lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 934 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries moderately more – 605 kg compared to 536 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
Omoda 5
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
305698_Volvo_EX90
305699_Volvo_EX90
305702_Volvo_EX90
305707_Volvo_EX90
305714_Volvo_EX90
305743_Volvo_EX90

Reviews Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
CHD
22 Apr 2026, 11:15:18

Full of faults — at least every other day there's something that needs to be fixed. Consumption 24 kWh/100 km in summer; in winter the range is half of what was promised. The safety would be good if the promised features actually worked.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Volvo EX90
Volvo ES90
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo ES90 are Volvo's newest premium electric models, each showcasing the brand's focus on safety, luxury and advanced electrified powertrains. The EX90 is the flagship electric SUV while the ES90 delivers similar technology in a more traditional sedan/fastback form, so your …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Omoda 5
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.