Compare performance (156 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Renault Clio?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the realm of compact cars, two iconic French models stand out: the Peugeot 2008 and the Renault Clio. Both cars offer distinct experiences and a touch of French flair, making them popular choices in the urban automotive landscape. Let's delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and what makes them unique.
The Peugeot 2008, with its SUV body type, aims to provide a more robust and spacious feel compared to the Renault Clio’s hatchback design. The 2008 measures 4304 mm in length, offering a generous trunk capacity of 434 liters, ideal for city dwellers who need extra cargo space. On the other hand, the Renault Clio, at 4053 mm in length, is a bit more compact, making urban parking and maneuvering a breeze, while still offering a respectable trunk capacity of 391 liters.
The Peugeot 2008 offers a versatile range of engines, including petrol, mild hybrid electric (MHEV), and a fully electric option. Power outputs range from 101 to 156 horsepower for the combustion models and up to 136 HP for the electric version. The highlight here is its impressive electric range of up to 406 km on a full charge, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver.
Conversely, the Renault Clio presents engine choices including a full hybrid, petrol, and even an LPG variant. Its hybrid engine delivers a balanced power of 143 HP, combining fuel efficiency with decent performance. For those looking for extreme efficiency, the hybrid version consumes only 4.3 L/100 km, making it a green alternative in everyday driving.
Performance enthusiasts will appreciate the nimbleness of the Peugeot 2008, particularly the electric variant, which hits 0-100 km/h in just 9 seconds. This is complemented by a top speed of 150 km/h for the electric model, ensuring that swift urban commutes are a guarantee.
The Renault Clio, while not as quick off the line, offers a practical driving experience with its hybrid model accelerating from 0-100 km/h in 9.3 seconds. The Clio’s maximum speed reaches up to 174 km/h, proving that you don't always have to step into an SUV for thrilling drives.
The Peugeot 2008 comes equipped with a modern Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission or a traditional manual option, providing drivers with flexibility in their driving preferences. Inside, the cabin is designed with comfort in mind, seating five in spacious accommodation, enhanced by its elevated SUV stance.
Renault Clio focuses on a seamless driving experience with its Automatic and CVT transmissions that promise smooth gear transitions. The interior space is optimized for comfort, despite its hatchback form factor, ensuring passengers enjoy the ride.
Both the Peugeot 2008 and Renault Clio excel in terms of efficiency. The Clio’s full hybrid model stands out with a CO2 emissions rating of 97 g/km, whereas the fully electric Peugeot 2008 boasts zero emissions, championing the electric vehicle movement.
The choice between the Peugeot 2008 and Renault Clio largely hinges on your lifestyle needs and preferences. The 2008 appeals with its spaciousness, versatility, and eco-friendly electric option, making it perfect for families or those needing extra space. In contrast, the Clio offers remarkable efficiency, agility, and a compact design, tailored for urban drivers who prioritize fuel savings and convenient city navigation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Clio is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Peugeot 2008 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,705 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers marginally more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.3 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 2008 delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is only slightly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,263 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers markedly more boot space – 434 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries barely more – 463 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The Peugeot 2008 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.
details
The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
405 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
92 - 118 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España