VS

Peugeot 2008 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Toyota C-HR+?

Peugeot 2008 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • substantially more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Peugeot 2008 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,229 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.3 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 2008. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers clearly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 202 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers substantially more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 187 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers markedly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 68 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is significantly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 547 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers marginally more boot space – 434 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries noticeably more – 655 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 208 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Peugeot 2008
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
BYD Atto 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Toyota C‑HR pits an all-electric, tech-focused compact against Toyota’s familiar crossover offering, so it’s really a choice between EV practicality and proven petrol/hybrid versatility. Think about daily range and charging convenience if you lean toward the Atto 3, …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Peugeot 2008
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 2008?

The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.