VS

Peugeot 208 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (21,000 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 208 or Skoda Enyaq?

Peugeot 208 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

208

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 208 is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,866 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 208 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 157 km more than the Peugeot 208.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.

208

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 208 is considerably lighter – 1,165 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 909 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 233 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries slightly more – 526 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Peugeot 208
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Peugeot 208
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,000 - 33,200 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
363 - 432 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 116 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,165 - 1,530 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,745 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
380 - 430 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.