Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Peugeot 308 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (195 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (29,200 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 308 or Skoda Enyaq?
Peugeot 308 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
308
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 308 is visibly cheaper – starting at 29,200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,611 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is barely more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.6 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 308. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 139 km more than the Peugeot 308.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 195 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot 308 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.
308
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 308 is substantially lighter – 1,453 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 621 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries very slightly more – 526 kg compared to 503 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
Peugeot 308
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 308
The Peugeot 308 brings a sleek, feline profile and an unexpectedly upscale cabin, with clever packaging and materials that feel a touch more premium than you might expect. It’s composed on the road, easy to live with for daily life, and a smart choice if you want a stylish hatch that still behaves when the road gets interesting.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Peugeot 308
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,200 - 42,600 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 450 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,453 - 1,749 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
314 - 412 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 503 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.