Compare performance (195 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (29,200 £ vs 46,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 308 or Volvo EC40?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Peugeot 308 is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,200 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,383 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 308 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 134 km more than the Peugeot 308.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers considerably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 195 HP. That’s roughly 247 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Peugeot 308 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Peugeot 308 is a bit faster – reaching 225 km/h, while the Volvo EC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 308 is substantially lighter – 1,453 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 612 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 308 offers marginally more boot space – 412 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 308 offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,323 L, about 127 L more than the Volvo EC40.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 308 carries moderately more – 503 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 308 brings a sleek, feline profile and an unexpectedly upscale cabin, with clever packaging and materials that feel a touch more premium than you might expect. It’s composed on the road, easy to live with for daily life, and a smart choice if you want a stylish hatch that still behaves when the road gets interesting.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,200 - 42,600 £
|
Price
46,600 - 59,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
78 - 450 km
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,453 - 1,749 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
314 - 412 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
4,367 mm
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
1,438 mm
|
Height
1,591 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,258 - 1,323 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,196 L
|
|
Payload
430 - 503 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 225 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Volvo
|