VS

Peugeot 408 vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (240 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Volvo XC60?

Peugeot 408 vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

408

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot 408 is significantly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,160 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Peugeot 408 with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 408 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 456 km, about 377 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers substantially more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.2 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.

408

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is noticeably lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 606 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries a bit more – 510 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 - 456 km
Peugeot 408
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
Peugeot 408
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 114 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
371 - 456 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.