VS

Polestar 4 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (544 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (53,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Polestar 4 or Skoda Enyaq?

Polestar 4 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Polestar 4

4.8 (12 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

4

The Battle of the Electric SUVs: Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4

In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, the SUV segment is seeing substantial innovation and competition. Two standout players in this space are the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4. Both models offer modern design, advanced technology, and eco-friendly credentials, but how do they stack up against each other? Let's explore their technical specifications and groundbreaking features.

Enyaq

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq offers a range of power outputs, with its highest performing model delivering up to 340 HP through an all-wheel-drive system. It reaches 0-100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds and has a maximum speed of 180 km/h. In contrast, the Polestar 4 boasts a maximum power output of 544 HP and an impressive acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 3.8 seconds, with a top speed of 200 km/h, showcasing its performance edge.

4

Battery Life and Efficiency

When it comes to range, the Skoda Enyaq provides a maximum electric range of 587 km on a single charge, supported by its efficient consumption of as low as 14.6 kWh/100km. On the other hand, the Polestar 4 offers a strong performance in this category with a top range of 620 km, albeit with a slightly higher energy consumption of 18.7 kWh/100km. Polestar's larger 94 kWh battery capacity plays a crucial role in extending its driving range.

Enyaq

Design and Dimensions

Both SUVs hold a striking presence on the road with their unique designs. The Skoda Enyaq measures up to 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and 1623 mm in height, offering a trunk capacity of up to 585 liters. Alternatively, the Polestar 4 stretches out more with dimensions of 4840 mm in length, 2008 mm in width, and 1534 mm in height, but with a smaller trunk capacity of 526 liters, it could be less appealing for those needing substantial cargo space.

4

Comfort and Practicality

Both vehicles are designed with practicality in mind, accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Enyaq is especially noted for its spaciousness and efficient use of interior space. Payload capacity differs slightly, with the Enyaq offering up to 528 kg compared to the Polestar 4's 516 kg, potentially a consideration for those needing to haul more substantial loads.

Enyaq

Environmental Impact and Innovation

Both the Skoda Enyaq and Polestar 4 proudly bear a CO2 efficiency class of "A," emitting zero direct carbon emissions, which is a testament to their commitment to sustainability. They each employ a reduction gearbox transmission, ensuring a smooth and efficient drive regardless of the terrain.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4 boils down to priorities. For those seeking exhilarating performance and greater range, the Polestar 4 is the clear winner. However, if efficiency, spaciousness, and practicality are at the top of your list, the Skoda Enyaq stands out as a balanced and capable option in the electric SUV market. Both offer an inspiring glimpse into the future of automotive design and technology.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

4

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,209 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Polestar 4. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Polestar 4 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 31 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 offers markedly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 4 delivers barely more torque with 686 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.

4

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is marginally lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,230 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more boot space – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries a bit more – 526 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 4 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 590 - 620 km
details
Polestar 4
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
7458E184-FE1C-49CD-8688-8D9AD87DD167
3ACA6B65-1C98-412F-9D32-588E078B6285
3634B075-6672-406F-B1C3-46F68F4A8DD7

Reviews Polestar 4

4.8 (12 Reviews)
rate
Didier
6 Jun 2026, 19:04:29

Beautiful car with exceptional comfort. Tesla is still the more affordable car, but if I'm going to drive, I'd go with Polestar without hesitation.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alain Lescadres
2 Jun 2026, 01:50:33

Fantastic car in all ways

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dave
21 May 2026, 08:55:02

Very nice comfort and interior feel. Big wide car with great seating front and rear.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 19:23:48

The Polestar 4 has a very attractive design that doesn’t go unnoticed.
The interior is elegant, comfortable and finished with good materials.
Easy to drive, great grip on the tarmac and strong acceleration.
For the price, there are things to improve to be competitive with other brands of equal quality and technology; it needs meaningful upgrades — e.g., better driving ADAS, true autonomous parking and the ability to move the car remotely if you can’t get inside. Improving charging times is essential, and not having a rear window while relying on a camera in the interior mirror shouldn’t be a cause for concern. Otherwise, a spectacular car with a gorgeous design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Polestar 4
Polestar 5
VS
Polestar 4 and Polestar 5 are sibling EVs with shared design DNA but different missions: the Polestar 4 is a compact coupe‑SUV aimed at style and everyday practicality, while the Polestar 5 is a larger four‑door gran turismo focused on performance, range and long‑distance comfort. This comparison …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Polestar 4 and Zeekr 7 GT represent two different approaches to the modern premium EV coupe-SUV: Polestar brings Scandinavian restraint and driver-focused dynamics, while the Zeekr emphasizes tech-rich features and value-packed performance. This comparison cuts through specs and marketing to show …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Polestar 2
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 2 is the compact, drivers‑first EV — nimble, practical and hard‑working for daily commutes — while the Polestar 4 ups the ante with coupe‑SUV looks, more interior space and a higher‑spec feel that commands a premium. If you want sharp handling and better value, choose the 2; if you crave …
Polestar 4
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
53,100 - 59,900 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,230 - 2,355 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
526 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,008 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Polestar
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Polestar 4 have?

The Polestar 4 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.