Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Mazda CX-30 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Mazda CX-30?
Renault Arkana vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is a bit cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,223 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
CX-30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers moderately more torque with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is only slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries barely more – 496 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £25,200
Mazda CX-30
Renault Arkana
Mazda CX-30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Renault Arkana
Mazda CX-30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.