Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (143 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (28500 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Skoda Kodiaq?
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8391 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 3.20 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 4.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 59 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls convincingly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is slightly lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 430 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 842 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq a bit takes the win – 563 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Renault Arkana
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Renault Arkana
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4568 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1821 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1576 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?
The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.