VS

Renault Arkana vs Suzuki Vitara comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Suzuki Vitara?

Renault Arkana vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more efficient
details

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Vitara is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,886 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Vitara

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers noticeably more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers visibly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 255 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries very slightly more – 451 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 344 - 426 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki Vitara and the Toyota Yaris Cross both aim at buyers wanting compact SUVs, but they take different approaches: the Vitara leans toward rugged simplicity and practical space, while the Yaris Cross focuses on urban refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll compare their practicality, driving …
Renault Arkana
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Suzuki Vitara

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

details
Suzuki_Vitara_002
Suzuki_Vitara_020
Suzuki_Vitara_039
Suzuki_Vitara_023
Suzuki_Vitara_004
Vitara_9

Reviews Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Jolanta
4 Feb 2026, 09:37:41

A very pleasant car for an affordable price. The only downside is poorly soundproofed doors and windows.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Polet
14 Jan 2026, 00:08:10

Proven reliability — it’s sold on every continent, and a real pleasure as a 4x4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro
15 Nov 2025, 18:50:42

After trying both, I chose the Vitara for everyday use. In my view, its balance of performance, quality and price is superior.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara are both compact SUVs that appeal to buyers who want a capable, practical vehicle, but they take different approaches — the Frontera leans toward a sturdier, more spacious package while the Vitara focuses on light off-road ability, efficiency and city-friendly …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Dacia Duster still shocks with back-to-basics toughness and an unbeatable price — real off-road chops and a cavernous boot for a fraction of the bill — while the Suzuki Vitara answers with sharper handling, nicer interior materials and smarter tech that feels a touch more grown-up. Choose the …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Comparing the ASX and Vitara helps buyers choose between two compact SUVs with different strengths: the ASX leans toward comfort and value, while the Vitara emphasizes nimble handling and fuel efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in space, safety, economy and driving feel so you can …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara? This quick, no-nonsense comparison focuses on real-world space, practicality, running costs and driving feel to show which crossover suits your everyday needs.
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a matchup: the compact, city-friendly Suzuki Vitara squares off against the RAV4-based Suzuki Across to settle whether you want sprightly urban agility or long-range hybrid practicality. The Vitara tempts with a cheeky drive and sensible price, while the Across answers with superior fuel …
Renault Arkana
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
0 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
395 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.