Compare performance (200 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Honda ZR-V?
In today's rapidly evolving automotive market, choosing the right SUV can be a daunting task. The Honda ZR-V and the Renault Austral, both 2023-2024 models, epitomize the perfect marriage of innovation and performance. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of both models, helping you make an informed decision.
The Honda ZR-V stands tall with a length of 4568 mm, a width of 1840 mm, and a height of 1613 mm. Its curb weight ranges between 1660 kg and 1710 kg. In contrast, the Renault Austral is slightly shorter at 4510 mm long, 1825 mm wide, and a bit more elevated with a height of 1618 mm. The Austral is lighter, with curb weights between 1539 kg and 1592 kg.
The heart of any car is its engine, and here both models display their unique strengths. The Honda ZR-V is powered by a 2.0-liter full hybrid engine delivering 184 HP (135 kW) with torque reaching 315 Nm. It provides a swift acceleration time of 7.9 to 8 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, making it a compelling choice for those who crave speed.
The Renault Austral offers a broader engine choice, with options ranging from a petrol MHEV producing 158 HP (116 kW) to a more powerful full hybrid engine at 200 HP (147 kW), achieving torque of 270 Nm. Although its acceleration, at 8.4 to 9.7 seconds, is slightly more languid compared to the ZR-V, it compensates with a higher top speed of 174 km/h.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Renault Austral leads with a consumption rate as low as 4.7 L/100km for its hybrid variant, compared to Honda's ZR-V which records 5.7 to 5.8 L/100km. The Austral also wins in CO2 emissions, achieving a low of 105 g/km, reflecting its C-class efficiency. The ZR-V, while still efficient, emits between 130 and 132 g/km, ranking it in the D-class efficiency category.
Both models offer a front-wheel drive system, but their transmission options differ. The ZR-V is paired with a CVT, enhancing its fuel-efficiency strategy and providing a seamless driving experience. On the other hand, the Renault Austral features an automatic gearbox, providing smoother gear shifts and an engaging driving feel. This adaptability in the Austral is complemented by a larger payload capacity, facilitating more versatile utility.
Inside, both the Honda ZR-V and Renault Austral comfortably seat five passengers. The Austral, however, offers a more generous trunk capacity of up to 500 liters compared to the ZR-V's 370 to 380 liters, emphasizing practicality for families or long journeys. Both SUVs prioritize rider comfort and modern infotainment, with anticipated high-tech features reflecting each brand's focus on user experience.
The decision between the Honda ZR-V and the Renault Austral boils down to preferences in engine performance, fuel efficiency, and storage needs. The ZR-V pulls ahead with better acceleration and powerful performance, while the Austral provides superior fuel economy, lower emissions, and greater utility space. Regardless of choice, both vehicles illustrate the cutting-edge innovation and flexibility that define the modern SUV era.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Austral is moderately cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Honda ZR-V costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Austral uses 4.8 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Austral offers barely more power – delivering 200 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda ZR-V is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda ZR-V delivers somewhat more torque with 315 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is marginally lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,660 kg. The difference is around 112 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Austral carries very slightly more – 477 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
The Renault Austral shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
Price
35,100 - 38,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
co2
130 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
Curb weight
1,660 - 1,710 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Payload
440 - 455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
Torque
315 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España