VS

Renault Austral vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (200 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Mazda CX-5?

Renault Austral vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Renault Austral

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Austral

Engines and Performance: A Battle of Power

When it comes to engine performance, both the Mazda CX-5 and Renault Austral offer distinct approaches to satisfying drivers. The Mazda CX-5 offers a choice between petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) and diesel engines, with a power range from 150 to 194 HP. This SUV doesn't just focus on power but also caters to a wide range of driving preferences with options for both manual and automatic transmissions. For those who prioritize stability and control, the CX-5 also offers all-wheel drive capabilities.

On the other hand, the Renault Austral presents itself with a greener stance, offering a mix of petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid engines, with power outputs at 158 and 200 HP. The Austral is primarily designed for efficiency and economy, reflected in its use of a continuous variable transmission (CVT) to maximize fuel efficiency and deliver a smoother driving experience.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency: Economy Meets Performance

In terms of fuel consumption, the Mazda CX-5 averages between 5.6 and 7.6 L/100km, while emitting CO2 ranging from 146 to 173 g/km. The variety of engine types and drives in the CX-5 enables buyers to prioritize either performance or efficiency, depending on their needs.

Renault Austral, with its hybrid efficiencies, boasts a superior fuel consumption rate at as low as 4.7 L/100km and CO2 emissions ranging between 105 and 139 g/km, positioning it as a more environmentally friendly choice. This efficiency is complemented by its slightly reduced curb weight, allowing for less fuel usage during acceleration and cruising.

Austral

Interior Comforts and Practicality

Both SUVs cater to practicality and comfort, seating five in each model. The dimensions of the Mazda CX-5 are slightly more generous, with a length of 4575 mm compared to the Austral's 4510 mm. The trunk capacity in the CX-5 ranges from 510 to 522 liters, providing a bit more space for luggage and cargo than the Austral's 430 to 500 liters.

The Renault Austral, meanwhile, focuses on intelligent use of space and offers smooth interior design innovations that maximize the available space. Although slightly more compact, its comfort features and user-friendly layout provide a premium experience to the occupants.

CX-5

Innovative Features and Technology

Technological innovation is a key selling point for both these SUVs. The Mazda CX-5 integrates advanced connectivity and safety features, ensuring a safe and enjoyable ride. It's designed to cater to drivers who relish long trips with reliable performance and comfort.

Renault, in its Austral, invests heavily in its hybrid technology to offer enhanced fuel savings and lower emissions. Its advanced driver assistance systems and modern infotainment setup keep the Austral competitive, especially for tech-savvy consumers seeking cutting-edge automotive technologies.

Austral

The Verdict: Choosing Between Tradition and Innovation

Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and Renault Austral ultimately depends on what's important to the driver. The Mazda CX-5 is for those who are inclined towards traditional performance, a wide range of powertrains, and a robust driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Austral appeals to those prioritizing efficient hybrid technology, practicality, and eco-friendly driving solutions.

Both models provide compelling arguments in their favor and stand as a testament to the innovation and diversity in today's SUV market. Each car brings its unique strengths to the table, ensuring potential buyers can find a model that aligns best with their lifestyle and driving preferences.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
If you want a sensible, well-rounded family SUV you can actually drive home today, the Renault Austral is the clear choice — comfortable, efficient and unfussy. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a futuristic concept car full of show-stopping ideas and tech, perfect for gawking at motor shows but …
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Austral

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Austral is very slightly cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Austral uses 4.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Austral offers markedly more power – delivering 200 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Austral is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is marginally faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Renault Austral tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Austral delivers a bit more torque with 270 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 32 Nm more.

Austral

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is only slightly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 81 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers very slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 283 L more than the Renault Austral.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Austral holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,900
Austral

Renault Austral

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 148 - 200 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
details
Renault Austral
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Austral

The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.

details
r220291p
r220293p
r220394p
r221062p
r221121p
r221115p

Reviews Renault Austral

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Kia Sportage
Renault Austral
VS
The Kia Sportage is the sensible, value-packed family SUV — comfortable, practical and a reliable all-rounder — while the Renault Austral plays the style card with a sharper interior, clever hybrid tech and more upmarket flair. Pick the Sportage for straightforward practicality and a friendlier …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Renault Austral
Renault Scénic
VS
In the battle of the Renault Austral versus the Renault Scénic, both models showcase the brand's flair for innovation and versatility. The Austral stands out with its sleek SUV design and advanced tech features, catering to a more adventurous lifestyle. Meanwhile, the Scénic continues to impress as …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Austral
VS
The Peugeot 3008 brings sharper styling, a premium-feeling interior and a slightly more engaging drive thanks to its taut chassis and characterful engines, while the Renault Austral focuses on spacious practicality, comfort and simpler, friendlier tech. Both offer efficient hybrid variants, but …
Ford Kuga
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga and Renault Austral stand out with their distinctive designs and advanced technology. The Kuga impresses with its dynamic driving experience and strong performance, while the Austral offers a comfortable ride with an emphasis on eco-friendly …
Renault Austral
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
109 - 145 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
4,533 mm
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,645 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
455 - 477 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
270 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Renault
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Renault Austral have?

The Renault Austral is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.