Compare performance (158 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The SUV segment continues to grow in popularity as drivers seek versatile and stylish vehicles that can handle both urban and off-road adventures. In this comparative review, we delve into the qualities and specifications of two standout models: the Renault Captur and the Suzuki Vitara. Each offers unique strengths and innovations tailored for modern drivers.
The Renault Captur measures 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, providing a spacious interior for up to five occupants. With a trunk capacity of 326 liters, it ensures versatility for daily errands or weekend getaways.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly more compact at 4185 mm in length and 1775 mm in width, though it has a comparable height of 1595 mm. This model boasts a trunk capacity of 375 liters, slightly edging out the Captur in terms of cargo space.
The Captur comes equipped with a variety of engine configurations, including full hybrid, petrol MHEV, and LPG options, ranging from 91 HP to a robust 158 HP. With a curb weight of up to 1522 kg, the Captur achieves a maximum speed of 180 km/h and boasts respectable fuel consumption figures of between 4.7 to 7.8 L/100 km, depending on the engine variant.
In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara features petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines with power outputs of 116 HP and 129 HP respectively. Its lighter weight, capped at 1395 kg, enhances performance, allowing for an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.5 seconds. Fuel efficiency stands at an impressive range of 5.0 to 5.6 L/100 km.
The Captur offers both automatic and manual transmission options, ensuring flexibility for different driving preferences. Notably, it features an automated dual-clutch transmission that enhances driving dynamics.
The Vitara, while also providing manual and automatic transmission choices, takes it a step further with the option of all-wheel drive, enhancing its capability across diverse terrains. This feature is particularly appealing for those looking to venture off the beaten path.
Both SUVs boast high-quality interiors designed with driver comfort in mind. The Captur is equipped with advanced technology, including an intuitive infotainment system and digital displays, ensuring a modern driving experience.
The Vitara, too, doesn’t fall short in the tech department, featuring a well-designed cockpit and user-friendly infotainment options. Additionally, both vehicles include safety and driver assistance technologies, although the specifics may vary.
Environmental consciousness is vital in today’s automotive market. The Renault Captur ranges from CO2 emissions of 106 to 139 g/km, with different engine types facilitating better efficiency ratings. Its full hybrid versions especially appeal to eco-minded consumers.
On the flip side, the Suzuki Vitara shows emissions ranging from 113 to 129 g/km, giving it a commendable edge in some variants. Combined with its efficient fuel consumption, the Vitara proves to be a suitable choice for drivers looking to minimize their carbon footprint.
Choosing between the Renault Captur and Suzuki Vitara ultimately hinges on your priorities. If you value a slightly larger SUV with a diverse range of engine options and modern tech, the Captur will meet your needs. However, if you’re looking for a nimble, all-wheel-drive option with solid performance and ecological efficiency, the Vitara might be the better choice.
In the end, both SUVs hold their own in the competitive automotive landscape, offering distinct advantages that cater to different lifestyles and preferences. Your perfect match awaits—ready to hit the road!
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Captur is moderately cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,186 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers slightly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers a bit more torque with 307 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 42 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is only slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 68 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers slightly more boot space – 422 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries barely more – 453 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.
details
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España