VS

Renault Clio vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Renault Clio vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • considerably cheaper
  • noticeably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,409 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers substantially more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Clio is barely faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Clio delivers clearly more torque with 190 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 88 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is noticeably lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 262 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers clearly more boot space – 327 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,176 L, about 264 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries somewhat more – 463 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Renault Clio
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Renault Clio
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 115 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
4,116 mm
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Renault
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.