VS

Renault Clio vs Skoda Kamiq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Renault Clio or Skoda Kamiq?

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Renault Clio vs Skoda Kamiq: A Comparative Look at Two Popular Models

In the competitive automotive landscape, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq stand out as appealing options for buyers seeking a blend of style, performance, and practicality. This article aims to dissect the strengths and weaknesses of both vehicles, focusing on technical specifications, innovations, and their overall market positioning.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Body Type and Dimensions

The Renault Clio is a sleek hatchback measuring 4053mm in length, 1798mm in width, and 1440mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it an excellent choice for urban driving, providing agility and ease of parking.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq is classified as an SUV, offering a more robust and elevated driving position. With a length of 4241mm, width of 1793mm, and height of 1562mm, the Kamiq's dimensions contribute to its spacious interior and superior load-carrying capability.

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Engine Performance and Efficiency

When it comes to engine types, the Renault Clio offers multiple options, including a Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG variants. It delivers power outputs ranging from 67 HP in its entry-level variant to a robust 143 HP for those seeking performance. This model is highly efficient, with fuel consumption as low as 4.3 L/100km and CO2 emissions starting at 97 g/km.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq exclusively features petrol engines, with power output options between 95 HP to a powerful 150 HP. While it falls slightly behind in fuel efficiency with a consumption ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, it still offers a respectable performance and CO2 emissions of 121 to 130 g/km, depending on the variant chosen.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Transmission and Driving Experience

The Renault Clio provides a versatile transmission lineup, including an automatic gearbox, manual gearbox, and CVT options. Its driving dynamics are enhanced by front-wheel drive, offering a spirited driving experience, especially for urban maneuverability.

Conversely, the Skoda Kamiq uses a dual-clutch automatic transmission alongside manual options, enhancing its performance and giving a sportier feel during drive. Both models offer a front-wheel-drive configuration, which contributes to their agility on the road.

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Acceleration and Maximum Speed

Acceleration from 0-100 km/h reveals the performance strengths of both vehicles. The Clio boasts an impressive range, with some variants hitting 100 km/h in as quick as 9.3 seconds, making it a fun choice for those who appreciate spirited driving.

The Skoda Kamiq doesn’t lag far behind, with its swiftest variant achieving the same speed in just 8.3 seconds. Furthermore, the Kamiq can reach a top speed of up to 214 km/h, compared to Clio's maximum of 174 km/h in the fastest version.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Interior Space and Comfort

While being a hatchback, the Renault Clio offers adequate space for up to five passengers, with a trunk capacity of 301 L. The cabin is designed with comfort in mind, making it a practical choice for everyday use.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq excels in interior space and practicality, with a trunk capacity of 400 L, further emphasizing its SUV credentials. Both vehicles have room for five passengers, but the Kamiq’s generous dimensions provide an airy and spacious cabin for all occupants.

Technology and Innovations

Modern technology is essential in today’s vehicles, and both models deliver in this aspect. The Renault Clio is equipped with an advanced infotainment system offering smartphone connectivity, navigation, and a host of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq does not shy away from technology either, offering its own space-efficient infotainment system featuring similar driver aids alongside a digital cockpit that heightens the driving experience. The Kamiq also boasts several innovative storage solutions, a hallmark feature of the Skoda brand.

Conclusion: Which One Suits Your Needs?

In summary, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq both offer compelling packages in their respective segments. The Clio shines in its performance and urban agility, making it a favorite amongst city drivers. Conversely, the Kamiq stands out with its SUV stature, offering increased space and practicality for families or longer journeys.

Your choice ultimately depends on your personal requirements and lifestyle. If you are drawn to sporty dynamics and a compact design, the Clio is a solid contender. However, if you require more space and versatile features in an SUV format, the Kamiq may be the better fit. Whichever you choose, both vehicles emerge as fantastic options on the modern automotive market, catering to a wide array of customers.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £, while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £. That’s a price difference of around 5126 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.30 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a barely noticeable edge – offering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Renault Clio takes 9.30 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs a bit better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls somewhat stronger with 250 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Clio is slight lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1231 kg. The difference is around 107 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers barely noticeable more room – 400 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs evident better – up to 1395 L, which is about 326 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq clearly perceptible takes the win – 539 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be slightly ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £21,700
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L
details

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio continues to impress with its sleek design and agile handling, making it a standout choice in the compact car segment. Inside, it offers a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin, crafted with high-quality materials that enhance the driving experience. Its fuel efficiency and reliable performance make it an attractive option for both city commuting and longer journeys.

details
r212202p @ renault-presse.de
r212188p @ renault-presse.de
r212211p @ renault-presse.de

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
rate

The Skoda Kamiq stands out in the compact SUV segment with its distinctive design and spacious interior. It offers a comfortable ride with advanced technology and safety features that make it suitable for both city driving and longer journeys. The Kamiq combines practicality with a touch of elegance, making it an appealing choice for those seeking a versatile vehicle.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice if you’d rather cart kids and shopping than chase Instagram likes.
Renault Clio
Skoda Kamiq
Clio
Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
16600 - 23000 £
Price
21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 5.3 L
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
97 - 121 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4053 mm
Length
4241 mm
Width
1798 mm
Width
1793 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1562 mm
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
Payload
398 - 406 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
67 - 143 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
160 - 174 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
49 - 105 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Renault
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if headline-grabbing looks and a bit more personality matter, the Taigo is your fun, slightly flashier choice.
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
In the battle of the Skoda Kamiq versus the Skoda Scala, buyers find themselves torn between functionality and style. The Kamiq, with its elevated stance and compact SUV appeal, offers a commanding driving position, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Scala impresses with its sleek hatchback design and spacious interior, catering to those who prioritize a dynamic driving experience and practicality in one refined package.
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior quality, making it a strong contender for those seeking a blend of practicality and performance.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a robust yet comfortable drive with a well-appointed interior, catering to those who prioritize practicality and style in urban settings.
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more premium feel for those seeking a blend of comfort and agility. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, showcasing the diverse appeal within the subcompact segment.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and eye-catching design. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference, as both models deliver unique strengths in this competitive segment.
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend of chic European design and agile handling, appealing to those seeking style and engaging driving dynamics.
Is the Renault Clio offered with different drivetrains?

The Renault Clio is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.