Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Skoda Kamiq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive automotive landscape, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq stand out as appealing options for buyers seeking a blend of style, performance, and practicality. This article aims to dissect the strengths and weaknesses of both vehicles, focusing on technical specifications, innovations, and their overall market positioning.
The Renault Clio is a sleek hatchback measuring 4053mm in length, 1798mm in width, and 1440mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it an excellent choice for urban driving, providing agility and ease of parking.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq is classified as an SUV, offering a more robust and elevated driving position. With a length of 4241mm, width of 1793mm, and height of 1562mm, the Kamiq's dimensions contribute to its spacious interior and superior load-carrying capability.
When it comes to engine types, the Renault Clio offers multiple options, including a Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG variants. It delivers power outputs ranging from 67 HP in its entry-level variant to a robust 143 HP for those seeking performance. This model is highly efficient, with fuel consumption as low as 4.3 L/100km and CO2 emissions starting at 97 g/km.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq exclusively features petrol engines, with power output options between 95 HP to a powerful 150 HP. While it falls slightly behind in fuel efficiency with a consumption ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, it still offers a respectable performance and CO2 emissions of 121 to 130 g/km, depending on the variant chosen.
The Renault Clio provides a versatile transmission lineup, including an automatic gearbox, manual gearbox, and CVT options. Its driving dynamics are enhanced by front-wheel drive, offering a spirited driving experience, especially for urban maneuverability.
Conversely, the Skoda Kamiq uses a dual-clutch automatic transmission alongside manual options, enhancing its performance and giving a sportier feel during drive. Both models offer a front-wheel-drive configuration, which contributes to their agility on the road.
Acceleration from 0-100 km/h reveals the performance strengths of both vehicles. The Clio boasts an impressive range, with some variants hitting 100 km/h in as quick as 9.3 seconds, making it a fun choice for those who appreciate spirited driving.
The Skoda Kamiq doesn’t lag far behind, with its swiftest variant achieving the same speed in just 8.3 seconds. Furthermore, the Kamiq can reach a top speed of up to 214 km/h, compared to Clio's maximum of 174 km/h in the fastest version.
While being a hatchback, the Renault Clio offers adequate space for up to five passengers, with a trunk capacity of 301 L. The cabin is designed with comfort in mind, making it a practical choice for everyday use.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq excels in interior space and practicality, with a trunk capacity of 400 L, further emphasizing its SUV credentials. Both vehicles have room for five passengers, but the Kamiq’s generous dimensions provide an airy and spacious cabin for all occupants.
Modern technology is essential in today’s vehicles, and both models deliver in this aspect. The Renault Clio is equipped with an advanced infotainment system offering smartphone connectivity, navigation, and a host of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq does not shy away from technology either, offering its own space-efficient infotainment system featuring similar driver aids alongside a digital cockpit that heightens the driving experience. The Kamiq also boasts several innovative storage solutions, a hallmark feature of the Skoda brand.
In summary, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq both offer compelling packages in their respective segments. The Clio shines in its performance and urban agility, making it a favorite amongst city drivers. Conversely, the Kamiq stands out with its SUV stature, offering increased space and practicality for families or longer journeys.
Your choice ultimately depends on your personal requirements and lifestyle. If you are drawn to sporty dynamics and a compact design, the Clio is a solid contender. However, if you require more space and versatile features in an SUV format, the Kamiq may be the better fit. Whichever you choose, both vehicles emerge as fantastic options on the modern automotive market, catering to a wide array of customers.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Clio is noticeably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,211 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers marginally more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly faster – reaching 216 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers visibly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is very slightly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers moderately more boot space – 400 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,395 L, about 219 L more than the Renault Clio.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries slightly more – 539 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
The Renault Clio sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
92 - 115 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4,116 mm
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
1,451 mm
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España